LLM-Ideoplasticity: Measuring Ideological Plasticity in the Political Behavior of LLMs as a Context-Conditioned Distribution

Accepted to Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 5th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (IJCNLP-AACL 2026), 2026

Oral Presentation

99th Percentile in ARR May 2026 (Top 62 / 17,087 submissions)

Citation (IEEE format): A. Sakhawat, S. R. Raiyan, T. Islam, T. Farhin, H. Mahmud and M. K. Hasan, "LLM-Ideoplasticity: Measuring Ideological Plasticity in the Political Behavior of LLMs as a Context-Conditioned Distribution," arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.28335, 2026.

arXiv PDF Code/Data Website

@article{sakhawat2026llmideoplasticity,
    title={{LLM}-Ideoplasticity: Measuring Ideological Plasticity in the Political Behavior of {LLMs} as a Context-Conditioned Distribution},
    author={Sakhawat, Adib and Raiyan, Syed Rifat and Islam, Tahsin and Farhin, Takia and Mahmud, Hasan and Hasan, Md Kamrul},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.28335},
    year={2026}
}

Authors: Adib Sakhawat†, Syed Rifat Raiyan†, Tahsin Islam, Takia Farhin, Hasan Mahmud, Md Kamrul Hasan.
Abstract: We argue, with systematic empirical evidence, that a large language model’s political ideology is not a fixed point, but a conditional distribution $\mathbb{P}(\text{position}\mid\text{context})$ over a real political space. We evaluate nine current LLMs using a unified measurement framework anchored by VAA-CHES projection models, which map responses onto three validated dimensions (lrgen, lrecon, galtan) across six contextual axes. Our findings reveal high sensitivity to context: persuasive framing and under-represented languages displace coordinates by up to 0.57 and 0.52 units, respectively, while chain-of-thought reasoning often amplifies rather than dampens paraphrase instability. Despite this local plasticity, the model cohort occupies a remarkably narrow Overton envelope overall, occupying roughly one-third the spread of major European parties. Supported by a multi-trait multi-method (MTMM) analysis, we conclude that a single point cannot summarize LLM political behavior; it must be characterized as a shape. Our code and data are publicly available at this https URL.